Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading
Although the project main actors, tutors and learners, have reached the envisaged work targets, and the global experience within this group has been positively evaluated, there is always a need of analysing and improving, if necessary. In this context, the Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading, synthesize the relevant aspects and conclusions drawn after each partner evaluation.
4. Analysis of the information provided by the partner institutions
4.2. Number of the lecturers involved in training activities
The course modules developed within the project were taught during face-to-face courses and were coordinated on the e-learning platform by members of the project teams within the consortium. The number of lecturers from each team is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Number of lecturers involved in training activities
|
Team |
Trainer |
|
CO: INCDTP /The National R&D Institute for Textiles and leather – Bucharest, Romania |
5 (group 1) 4 (group 2) |
|
P1: University of Minho, School of Engineering, Department of Textile Engineering – Minho, Portugal |
3 |
|
P2: TZU/Textile Testing Institute – Brno, Czech Republic |
3 |
|
P3: University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Textile Materials and Design – Maribor, Slovenia |
8 |
|
P4: TUIASI/ Technical University “Gheorghe Asachi”, Faculty of Textiles-Leather and Industrial Management – Iasi, Romania |
7 |