Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading
Although the project main actors, tutors and learners, have reached the envisaged work targets, and the global experience within this group has been positively evaluated, there is always a need of analysing and improving, if necessary. In this context, the Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading, synthesize the relevant aspects and conclusions drawn after each partner evaluation.
4. Analysis of the information provided by the partner institutions
4.8. The three most interesting module for the majority of participants
Based on responses from participants' feedback questionnaires, each partner has compiled a ranking of the three main modules.
In order to achieve the ranking of the modules, the following algorithm was applied: a number of points were awarded for the position in the hierarchy (1st → 3p, 2p → 2nd, 3rd → 1p) and then, the scores corresponding to each module were cumulated.
After processing the data provided, have been obtained the results shown in the Table 7.
Table 7. Hierarchy for the three most interesting modules
|
|
INCDTP Buc.1 |
Uni. Minho |
TZU Brno |
Uni. Maribor |
TU Iasi |
INCDTP Buc.2 |
Total |
Hierarchy |
|
Advanced knitting |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Virtual prototyping |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
10 |
2nd |
|
Textile Testing |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
5 |
3rd |
|
Sustainability |
1 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3rd |
|
Entrepreneurship |
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
12 |
1st |
|
Innovation management |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Standardization |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|