Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading
Although the project main actors, tutors and learners, have reached the envisaged work targets, and the global experience within this group has been positively evaluated, there is always a need of analysing and improving, if necessary. In this context, the Guide for courses evaluation and upgrading, synthesize the relevant aspects and conclusions drawn after each partner evaluation.
4. Analysis of the information provided by the partner institutions
4.12. Table 8. Summary of the aspects considered relevant by the participants
Aspects considered relevant by the participants |
||
Strong points |
Weak points |
Proposals |
- Quick access to all relevant information - Modules are up-to-date; - Positive feed-back, interactivity, high interest and networking. - Benefits for the trainees as well as for the companies in which they are working, to learn new technologies and their implementation; - Excellent occasion for improving the knowledge in advanced textile-related fields; - Good technical level of the support materials based on publications; - Access to information at any time on the e-learning platform; - Innovative technologies in textiles are interesting - Motivated and capable lecturers - Time and place independency when using the e-learning materials - Trainees were pleased to receive the certificates of attendance for face-to-face courses and for e-learning courses; - Unique platform for hosting the modules; - High expertise of the authors and trainers.
|
- Only some of the modules are relevant for an individual participant - Differences of trainee’s knowledge in using the computer. - Insufficient number of hours for the face-to-face courses; - It should be more practical. - The course was not entirely online. - Too complex for some individual participants - Not all of the modules are interesting for all of the participants - Only one or some of the modules cannot be chosen - Too much info concentrated within the education modules - Time allocated to study for each module was too short
|
- The course could be more detailed, in order to offer more information; - Performing of a summary of the whole course. - Possibility to pass the test for individual module in case of interest - Only one or some of the modules can be chosen - Further improvements of the e-learning materials and functionalities of the e-learning platform - Division of the modules into more detailed subchapters; - New opportunities for future cooperation based on the interesting new projects resulted from the brokerage of business and research ideas. |